divendres, 14 de febrer de 2014

BECAUSE WE ARE IDIOTS, MOST OF US....SOME PEOPLE CAN TALK AS TOUGH SERVANTS WERE MERE MACHINES

APTER IV

Our architect arrived on Friday afternoon, or rather, his assistant.
I felt from the first I was going to like him.  He is shy, and that, of course, makes him appear awkward.  But, as I explained to Robina, it is the shy young men who, generally speaking, turn out best: few men could have been more painfully shy up to twenty-five than myself.
Robina said that was different: in the case of an author it did not matter.  Robina’s attitude towards the literary profession would not annoy me so much were it not typical.  To be a literary man is, in Robina’s opinion, to be a licensed idiot.  It was only a week or two ago that I overheard from my study window a conversation between Veronica and Robina upon this very point.  Veronica’s eye had caught something lying on the grass.  I could not myself see what it was, in consequence of an intervening laurel bush.  Veronica stooped down and examined it with care.  The next instant, uttering a piercing whoop, she leapt into the air; then, clapping her hands, began to dance.  Her face was radiant with a holy joy.  Robina, passing near, stopped and demanded explanation.
“Pa’s tennis racket!” shouted Veronica—Veronica never sees the use of talking in an ordinary tone of voice when shouting will do just as well.  She continued clapping her hands and taking little bounds into the air.
“Well, what are you going on like that for?” asked Robina.  “It hasn’t bit you, has it?”
“It’s been out all night in the wet,” shouted Veronica.  “He forgot to bring it in.”
“You wicked child!” said Robina severely.  “It’s nothing to be pleased about.”
“Yes, it is,” explained Veronica.  “I thought at first it was mine.  Oh, wouldn’t there have been a talk about it, if it had been!  Oh my! wouldn’t there have been a row!”  She settled down to a steady rhythmic dance, suggestive of a Greek chorus expressing satisfaction with the gods.
Robina seized her by the shoulders and shook her back into herself.  “If it had been yours,” said Robina, “you would deserve to have been sent to bed.”
“Well, then, why don’t he go to bed?” argued Veronica.
Robina took her by the arm and walked her up and down just underneath my window.  I listened, because the conversation interested me.
“Pa, as I am always explaining to you,” said Robina, “is a literary man.  He cannot help forgetting things.”
“Well, I can’t help forgetting things,” insisted Veronica.
“You find it hard,” explained Robina kindly; “but if you keep on trying you will succeed.  You will get more thoughtful.  I used to be forgetful and do foolish things once, when I was a little girl.”
“Good thing for us if we was all literary,” suggested Veronica.
“If we ‘were’ all literary,” Robina corrected her.  “But you see we are not.  You and I and Dick, we are just ordinary mortals.  We must try and think, and be sensible.  In the same way, when Pa gets excited and raves—I mean, seems to rave—it’s the literary temperament.  He can’t help it.”
“Can’t you help doing anything when you are literary?” asked Veronica.
“There’s a good deal you can’t help,” answered Robina.  “It isn’t fair to judge them by the ordinary standard.”
They drifted towards the kitchen garden—it was the time of strawberries—and the remainder of the talk I lost.  I noticed that for some days afterwards Veronica displayed a tendency to shutting herself up in the schoolroom with a copybook, and that lead pencils had a way of disappearing from my desk.  One in particular that had suited me I determined if possible to recover.  A subtle instinct guided me to Veronica’s sanctum.  I found her thoughtfully sucking it.  She explained to me that she was writing a little play.
“You get things from your father, don’t you?” she enquired of me.
“You do,” I admitted; “but you ought not to take them without asking.  I am always telling you of it.  That pencil is the only one I can write with.”
“I didn’t mean the pencil,” explained Veronica.  “I was wondering if I had got your literary temper.”
It is puzzling, when you come to think of it, this estimate accorded by the general public to the littérateur.  It stands to reason that the man who writes books, explaining everything and putting everybody right, must be himself an exceptionally clever man; else how could he do it!  The thing is pure logic.  Yet to listen to Robina and her like you might think we had not sense enough to run ourselves, as the saying is—let alone running the universe.  If I would let her, Robina would sit and give me information by the hour.
“The ordinary girl . . . ” Robina will begin, with the air of a University Extension Lecturer.
It is so exasperating.  As if I did not know all there is to be known about girls!  Why, it is my business.  I point this out to Robina.
“Yes, I know,” Robina will answer sweetly.  “But I was meaning the real girl.”
It would make not the slightest difference were I even quite a high-class literary man—Robina thinks I am: she is a dear child.  Were I Shakespeare himself, and could I in consequence say to her: “Methinks, child, the creator of Ophelia and Juliet, and Rosamund and Beatrice, must surely know something about girls,” Robina would still make answer:
“Of course, Pa dear.  Everybody knows how clever you are.  But I was thinking for the moment of real girls.”
I wonder to myself sometimes, Is literature to the general reader ever anything more than a fairy-tale?  We write with our heart’s blood, as we put it.  We ask our conscience, Is it right thus to lay bare the secrets of our souls?  The general reader does not grasp that we are writing with our heart’s blood: to him it is just ink.  He does not believe we are laying bare the secrets of our souls: he takes it we are just pretending.  “Once upon a time there lived a girl named Angelina who loved a party by the name of Edwin.”  He imagines—he, the general reader—when we tell him all the wonderful thoughts that were inside Angelina, that it was we who put them there.  He does not know, he will not try to understand, that Angelina is in reality more real than is Miss Jones, who rides up every morning in the ’bus with him, and has a pretty knack of rendering conversation about the weather novel and suggestive.  As a boy I won some popularity among my schoolmates as a teller of stories.  One afternoon, to a small collection with whom I was homing across Regent’s Park, I told the story of a beautiful Princess.  But she was not the ordinary Princess.  She would not behave as a Princess should.  I could not help it.  The others heard only my voice, but I was listening to the wind.  She thought she loved the Prince—until he had wounded the Dragon unto death and had carried her away into the wood.  Then, while the Prince lay sleeping, she heard the Dragon calling to her in its pain, and crept back to where it lay bleeding, and put her arms about its scaly neck and kissed it; and that healed it.  I was hoping myself that at this point it would turn into a prince itself, but it didn’t; it just remained a dragon—so the wind said.  Yet the Princess loved it: it wasn’t half a bad dragon, when you knew it.  I could not tell them what became of the Prince: the wind didn’t seem to care a hang about the Prince.
Myself, I liked the story, but Hocker, who was a Fifth Form boy, voicing our little public, said it was rot, so far, and that I had got to hurry up and finish things rightly.
“But that is all,” I told them.
“No, it isn’t,” said Hocker.  “She’s got to marry the Prince in the end.  He’ll have to kill the Dragon again; and mind he does it properly this time.  Whoever heard of a Princess leaving a Prince for a Dragon!”
“But she wasn’t the ordinary sort of Princess,” I argued.
“Then she’s got to be,” criticised Hocker.  “Don’t you give yourself so many airs.  You make her marry the Prince, and be slippy about it.  I’ve got to catch the four-fifteen from Chalk Farm station.”
“But she didn’t,” I persisted obstinately.  “She married the Dragon and lived happy ever afterwards.”
Hocker adopted sterner measures.  He seized my arm and twisted it behind me.
“She married who?” demanded Hocker: grammar was not Hocker’s strong point.
“The Dragon,” I growled.
“She married who?” repeated Hocker.
“The Dragon,” I whined.
“She married who?” for the third time urged Hocker.
Hocker was strong, and the tears were forcing themselves into my eyes in spite of me.  So the Princess in return for healing the Dragon made it promise to reform.  It went back with her to the Prince, and made itself generally useful to both of them for the rest of the tour.  And the Prince took the Princess home with him and married her; and the Dragon died and was buried.  The others liked the story better, but I hated it; and the wind sighed and died away.
The little crowd becomes the reading public, and Hocker grows into an editor; he twists my arm in other ways.  Some are brave, so the crowd kicks them and scurries off to catch the four-fifteen.  But most of us, I fear, are slaves to Hocker.  Then, after awhile, the wind grows sulky and will not tell us stories any more, and we have to make them up out of our own heads.  Perhaps it is just as well.  What were doors and windows made for but to keep out the wind.
He is a dangerous fellow, this wandering Wind; he leads me astray.  I was talking about our architect.
He made a bad start, so far as Robina was concerned, by coming in at the back-door.  Robina, in a big apron, was washing up.  He apologised for having blundered into the kitchen, and offered to go out again and work round to the front.  Robina replied, with unnecessary severity as I thought, that an architect, if anyone, might have known the difference between the right side of a house and the wrong; but presumed that youth and inexperience could always be pleaded as excuse for stupidity.  I cannot myself see why Robina should have been so much annoyed.  Labour, as Robina had been explaining to Veronica only a few hours before, exalts a woman.  In olden days, ladies—the highest in the land—were proud, not ashamed, of their ability to perform domestic duties.  This, later on, I pointed out to Robina.  Her answer was that in olden days you didn’t have chits of boys going about, calling themselves architects, and opening back-doors without knocking; or if they did knock, knocking so that nobody on earth could hear them.
Robina wiped her hands on the towel behind the door, and brought him into the front-room, where she announced him, coldly, as “The young man from the architect’s office.”  He explained—but quite modestly—that he was not exactly Messrs. Spreight’s young man, but an architect himself, a junior member of the firm.  To make it clear he produced his card, which was that of Mr. Archibald T. Bute, F.R.I.B.A.  Practically speaking, all this was unnecessary.  Through the open door I had, of course, heard every word; and old Spreight had told me of his intention to send me one of his most promising assistants, who would be able to devote himself entirely to my work.  I put matters right by introducing him formally to Robina.  They bowed to one another rather stiffly.  Robina said that if he would excuse her she would return to her work; and he answered “Charmed,” and also that he didn’t mean it.  As I have tried to get it into Robina’s head, the young fellow was confused.  He had meant—it was self-evident—that he was charmed at being introduced to her, not at her desire to return to the kitchen.  But Robina appears to have taken a dislike to him.
I gave him a cigar, and we started for the house.  It lies just a mile from this cottage, the other side of the wood.  One excellent trait in him I soon discovered—he is intelligent without knowing everything.
I confess it to my shame, but the young man who knows everything has come to pall upon me.  According to Emerson, this is a proof of my own intellectual feebleness.  The strong man, intellectually, cultivates the society of his superiors.  He wants to get on, he wants to learn things.  If I loved knowledge as one should, I would have no one but young men about me.  There was a friend of Dick’s, a gentleman from Rugby.  At one time he had hopes of me; I felt he had.  But he was too impatient.  He tried to bring me on too quickly.  You must take into consideration natural capacity.  After listening to him for an hour or two my mind would wander.  I could not help it.  The careless laughter of uninformed middle-aged gentlemen and ladies would creep to me from the croquet lawn or from the billiard-room.  I longed to be among them.  Sometimes I would battle with my lower nature.  What did they know?  What could they tell me?  More often I would succumb.  There were occasions when I used to get up and go away from him, quite suddenly.
I talked with young Bute during our walk about domestic architecture in general.  He said he should describe the present tendency in domestic architecture as towards corners.  The desire of the British public was to go into a corner and live.  A lady for whose husband his firm had lately built a house in Surrey had propounded to him a problem in connection with this point.  She agreed it was a charming house; no house in Surrey had more corners, and that was saying much.  But she could not see how for the future she was going to bring up her children.  She was a humanely minded lady.  Hitherto she had punished them, when needful, by putting them in the corner; the shame of it had always exercised upon them a salutary effect.  But in the new house corners are reckoned the prime parts of every room.  It is the honoured guest who is sent into the corner.  The father has a corner sacred to himself, with high up above his head a complicated cupboard, wherein with the help of a step-ladder, he may keep his pipes and his tobacco, and thus by slow degrees cure himself of the habit of smoking.  The mother likewise has her corner, where stands her spinning-wheel, in case the idea comes to her to weave sheets and underclothing.  It also has a book-shelf supporting thirteen volumes, arranged in a sloping position to look natural; the last one maintained at its angle of forty-five degrees by a ginger-jar in old blue Nankin.  You are not supposed to touch them, because that would disarrange them.  Besides which, fooling about, you might upset the ginger-jar.  The consequence of all this is the corner is no longer disgraceful.  The parent can no more say to the erring child:
“You wicked boy!  Go into the cosy corner this very minute!”
In the house of the future the place of punishment will have to be the middle of the room.  The angry mother will exclaim:
“Don’t you answer me, you saucy minx!  You go straight into the middle of the room, and don’t you dare to come out of it till I tell you!”
The difficulty with the artistic house is finding the right people to put into it.  In the picture the artistic room never has anybody in it.  There is a strip of art embroidery upon the table, together with a bowl of roses.  Upon the ancient high-backed settee lies an item of fancy work, unfinished—just as she left it.  In the “study” an open book, face downwards, has been left on a chair.  It is the last book he was reading—it has never been disturbed.  A pipe of quaint design is cold upon the lintel of the lattice window.  No one will ever smoke that pipe again: it must have been difficult to smoke at any time.  The sight of the artistic room, as depicted in the furniture catalogue, always brings tears to my eyes.  People once inhabited these rooms, read there those old volumes bound in vellum, smoked—or tried to smoke—these impracticable pipes; white hands, that someone maybe had loved to kiss, once fluttered among the folds of these unfinished antimacassars, or Berlin wool-work slippers, and went away, leaving the things about.
One takes it that the people who once occupied these artistic rooms are now all dead.  This was their “Dining-Room.”  They sat on those artistic chairs.  They could hardly have used the dinner service set out upon the Elizabethan dresser, because that would have left the dresser bare: one assumes they had an extra service for use, or else that they took their meals in the kitchen.  The “Entrance Hall” is a singularly chaste apartment.  There is no necessity for a door-mat: people with muddy boots, it is to be presumed, were sent round to the back.  A riding-cloak, the relic apparently of a highwayman, hangs behind the door.  It is the sort of cloak you would expect to find there—a decorative cloak.  An umbrella or a waterproof cape would be fatal to the whole effect.
Now and again the illustrator of the artistic room will permit a young girl to come and sit there.  But she has to be a very carefully selected girl.  To begin with, she has got to look and dress as though she had been born at least three hundred years ago.  She has got to have that sort of clothes, and she has got to have her hair done just that way.
She has got to look sad; a cheerful girl in the artistic room would jar one’s artistic sense.  One imagines the artist consulting with the proud possessor of the house.
“You haven’t got such a thing as a miserable daughter, have you?  Some fairly good-looking girl who has been crossed in love, or is misunderstood.  Because if so, you might dress her up in something out of the local museum and send her along.  A little thing like that gives verisimilitude to a design.”
She must not touch anything.  All she may do is to read a book—not really read it, that would suggest too much life and movement: she sits with the book in her lap and gazes into the fire, if it happens to be the dining-room: or out of the window if it happens to be a morning-room, and the architect wishes to call attention to the window-seat.  Nothing of the male species, as far as I have been able to ascertain, has ever entered these rooms.  I once thought I had found a man who had been allowed into his own “Smoking-Den,” but on closer examination it turned out he was only a portrait.
Sometimes one is given “Vistas.”  Doors stand open, and you can see right away through “The Nook” into the garden.  There is never a living soul about the place.  The whole family has been sent out for a walk or locked up in the cellars.  This strikes you as odd until you come to think the matter out.  The modern man and woman is not artistic.  I am not artistic—not what I call really artistic.  I don’t go well with Gobelin tapestry and warming-pans.  I feel I don’t.  Robina is not artistic, not in that sense.  I tried her once with a harpsichord I picked up cheap in Wardour Street, and a reproduction of a Roman stool.  The thing was an utter failure.  A cottage piano, with a photo-frame and a fern upon, it is what the soul cries out for in connection with Robina.  Dick is not artistic.  Dick does not go with peacocks’ feathers and guitars.  I can see Dick with a single peacock’s feather at St. Giles’s Fair, when the bulldogs are not looking; but the decorative panel of peacock’s feathers is too much for him.  I can imagine him with a banjo—but a guitar decorated with pink ribbons!  To begin with he is not dressed for it.  Unless a family be prepared to make themselves up as troubadours or cavaliers and to talk blank verse, I don’t see how they can expect to be happy living in these fifteenth-century houses.  The modern family—the old man in baggy trousers and a frock-coat he could not button if he tried to; the mother of figure distinctly Victorian; the boys in flannel suits and collars up to their ears; the girls in motor caps—are as incongruous in these mediæval dwellings as a party of Cook’s tourists drinking bottled beer in the streets of Pompeii.
The designer of “The Artistic Home” is right in keeping to still life.  In the artistic home—to paraphrase Dr. Watts—every prospect pleases and only man is inartistic.  In the picture, the artistic bedroom, “in apple green, the bedstead of cherry-wood, with a touch of turkey-red throughout the draperies,” is charming.  It need hardly be said the bed is empty.  Put a man or woman in that cherry-wood bed—I don’t care how artistic they may think themselves—the charm would be gone.  The really artistic party, one supposes, has a little room behind, where he sleeps and dresses himself.  He peeps in at the door of this artistic bedroom, maybe occasionally enters to change the roses.
Imagine the artistic nursery five minutes after the real child had been let loose in it.  I know a lady who once spent hundreds of pounds on an artistic nursery.  She showed it to her friends with pride.  The children were allowed in there on Sunday afternoons.  I did an equally silly thing myself not long ago.  Lured by a furniture catalogue, I started Robina in a boudoir.  I gave it to her as a birthday-present.  We have both regretted it ever since.  Robina reckons she could have had a bicycle, a diamond bracelet, and a mandoline, and I should have saved money.  I did the thing well.  I told the furniture people I wanted it just as it stood in the picture: “Design for bedroom and boudoir combined, suitable for young girl, in teak, with sparrow blue hangings.”  We had everything: the antique fire arrangements that a vestal virgin might possibly have understood; the candlesticks, that were pictures in themselves, until we tried to put candles in them; the book-case and writing-desk combined, that wasn’t big enough to write on, and out of which it was impossible to get a book until you had abandoned the idea of writing and had closed the cover; the enclosed washstand, that shut down and looked like an old bureau, with the inevitable bowl of flowers upon it that had to be taken off and put on the floor whenever you wanted to use the thing as a washstand; the toilet-table, with its cunning little glass, just big enough to see your nose in; the bedstead, hidden away behind the “thinking corner,” where the girl couldn’t get at it to make it.  A prettier room you could not have imagined, till Robina started sleeping in it.  I think she tried.  Girl friends of hers, to whom she had bragged about it, would drop in and ask to be allowed to see it.  Robina would say, “Wait a minute,” and would run up and slam the door; and we would hear her for the next half-hour or so rushing round opening and shutting drawers and dragging things about.  By the time it was a boudoir again she was exhausted and irritable.  She wants now to give it up to Veronica, but Veronica objects to the position, which is between the bathroom and my study.  Her idea is a room more removed, where she would be able to shut herself in and do her work, as she explains, without fear of interruption.
Young Bute told me that a friend of his, a well-to-do young fellow, who lived in Piccadilly, had had the whim to make his flat the reproduction of a Roman villa.  There were of course no fires, the rooms were warmed by hot air from the kitchen.  They had a cheerless aspect on a November afternoon, and nobody knew exactly where to sit.  Light was obtained in the evening from Grecian lamps, which made it easy to understand why the ancient Athenians, as a rule, went to bed early.  You dined sprawling on a couch.  This was no doubt practicable when you took your plate into your hand and fed yourself with your fingers; but with a knife and fork the meal had all the advantages of a hot picnic.  You did not feel luxurious or even wicked: you only felt nervous about your clothes.  The thing lacked completeness.  He could not expect his friends to come to him in Roman togas, and even his own man declined firmly to wear the costume of a Roman slave.  The compromise was unsatisfactory, even from the purely pictorial point of view.  You cannot be a Roman patrician of the time of Antoninus when you happen to live in Piccadilly at the opening of the twentieth century.  All you can do is to make your friends uncomfortable and spoil their dinner for them.  Young Bute said that, so far as he was concerned, he would always rather have spent the evening with his little nephews and nieces, playing at horses; it seemed to him a more sensible game.
Young Bute said that, speaking as an architect, he of course admired the ancient masterpieces of his art.  He admired the Erechtheum at Athens; but Spurgeon’s Tabernacle in the Old Kent Road built upon the same model would have irritated him.  For a Grecian temple you wanted Grecian skies and Grecian girls.  He said that, even as it was, Westminster Abbey in the season was an eyesore to him.  The Dean and Choir in their white surplices passed muster, but the congregation in its black frock-coats and Paris hats gave him the same sense of incongruity as would a banquet of barefooted friars in the dining-hall of the Cannon Street Hotel.
It struck me there was sense in what he said.  I decided not to mention my idea of carving 1553 above the front-door.
He said he could not understand this passion of the modern house-builder for playing at being a Crusader or a Canterbury Pilgrim.  A retired Berlin boot-maker of his acquaintance had built himself a miniature Roman Castle near Heidelberg.  They played billiards in the dungeon, and let off fireworks on the Kaiser’s birthday from the roof of the watch-tower.
Another acquaintance of his, a draper at Holloway, had built himself a moated grange.  The moat was supplied from the water-works under special arrangement, and all the electric lights were imitation candles.  He had done the thing thoroughly.  He had even designed a haunted chamber in blue, and a miniature chapel, which he used as a telephone closet.  Young Bute had been invited down there for the shooting in the autumn.  He said he could not be sure whether he was doing right or wrong, but his intention was to provide himself with a bow and arrows.
A change was coming over this young man.  We had talked on other subjects and he had been shy and deferential.  On this matter of bricks and mortar he spoke as one explaining things.
I ventured to say a few words in favour of the Tudor house.  The Tudor house, he argued, was a fit and proper residence for the Tudor citizen—for the man whose wife rode behind him on a pack-saddle, who conducted his correspondence by the help of a moss-trooper.  The Tudor fireplace was designed for folks to whom coal was unknown, and who left their smoking to their chimneys.  A house that looked ridiculous with a motor-car before the door, where the electric bell jarred upon one’s sense of fitness every time one heard it, was out of date, he maintained.
“For you, sir,” he continued, “a twentieth-century writer, to build yourself a Tudor House would be as absurd as for Ben Jonson to have planned himself a Norman Castle with a torture-chamber underneath the wine-cellar, and the fireplace in the middle of the dining-hall.  His fellow cronies of the Mermaid would have thought him stark, staring mad.”
There was reason in what he was saying.  I decided not to mention my idea of altering the chimneys and fixing up imitation gables, especially as young Bute seemed pleased with the house, which by this time we had reached.
“Now, that is a good house,” said young Bute.  “That is a house where a man in a frock-coat and trousers can sit down and not feel himself a stranger from another age.  It was built for a man who wore a frock-coat and trousers—on weekdays, maybe, gaiters and a shooting-coat.  You can enjoy a game of billiards in that house without the feeling that comes to you when playing tennis in the shadow of the Pyramids.”
We entered, and I put before him my notions—such of them as I felt he would approve.  We were some time about the business, and when we looked at our watches young Bute’s last train to town had gone.  There still remained much to talk about, and I suggested he should return with me to the cottage and take his luck.  I could sleep with Dick and he could have my room.  I told him about the cow, but he said he was a practised sleeper and would be delighted, if I could lend him a night-shirt, and if I thought Miss Robina would not be put out.  I assured him that it would be a good thing for Robina; the unexpected guest would be a useful lesson to her in housekeeping.  Besides, as I pointed out to him, it didn’t really matter even if Robina were put out.
“Not to you, sir, perhaps,” he answered, with a smile.  “It is not with you that she will be indignant.”
“That will be all right, my boy,” I told him; “I take all responsibility.”
“And I shall get all the blame,” he laughed.
But, as I pointed out to him, it really didn’t matter whom Robina blamed.  We talked about women generally on our way back.  I told him—impressing upon him there was no need for it to go farther—that I personally had come to the conclusion that the best way to deal with women was to treat them all as children.  He agreed it might be a good method, but wanted to know what you did when they treated you as a child.
I know a most delightful couple: they have been married nearly twenty years, and both will assure you that an angry word has never passed between them.  He calls her his “Little One,” although she must be quite six inches taller than himself, and is never tired of patting her hand or pinching her ear.  They asked her once in the drawing-room—so the Little Mother tells me—her recipe for domestic bliss.  She said the mistake most women made was taking men too seriously.
“They are just overgrown children, that’s all they are, poor dears,” she laughed.
There are two kinds of love: there is the love that kneels and looks upward, and the love that looks down and pats.  For durability I am prepared to back the latter.
The architect had died out of young Bute; he was again a shy young man during our walk back to the cottage.  My hand was on the latch when he stayed me.
“Isn’t this the back-door again, sir?” he enquired.
It was the back-door; I had not noticed it.
“Hadn’t we better go round to the front, sir, don’t you think?” he said.
“It doesn’t matter—” I began.
But he had disappeared.  So I followed him, and we entered by the front.  Robina was standing by the table, peeling potatoes.
“I have brought Mr. Bute back with me,” I explained.  “He is going to stop the night.”
Robina said: “If ever I go to live in a cottage again it will have one door.”  She took her potatoes with her and went upstairs.
“I do hope she isn’t put out,” said young Bute.
“Don’t worry yourself,” I comforted him.  “Of course she isn’t put out.  Besides, I don’t care if she is.  She’s got to get used to being put out; it’s part of the lesson of life.”
I took him upstairs, meaning to show him his bedroom and take my own things out of it.  The doors of the two bedrooms were opposite one another.  I made a mistake and opened the wrong door.  Robina, still peeling potatoes, was sitting on the bed.
I explained we had made a mistake.  Robina said it was of no consequence whatever, and, taking the potatoes with her, went downstairs again.  Looking out of the window, I saw her making towards the wood.  She was taking the potatoes with her.
“I do wish we hadn’t opened the door of the wrong room,” groaned young Bute.
“What a worrying chap you are!” I said to him.  “Look at the thing from the humorous point of view.  It’s funny when you come to think of it.  Wherever the poor girl goes, trying to peel her potatoes in peace and quietness, we burst in upon her.  What we ought to do now is to take a walk in the wood.  It is a pretty wood.  We might say we had come to pick wild flowers.”
But I could not persuade him.  He said he had letters to write, and, if I would allow him, would remain in his room till dinner was ready.
Dick and Veronica came in a little later.  Dick had been to see Mr. St. Leonard to arrange about lessons in farming.  He said he thought I should like the old man, who wasn’t a bit like a farmer.  He had brought Veronica back in one of her good moods, she having met there and fallen in love with a donkey.  Dick confided to me that, without committing himself, he had hinted to Veronica that if she would remain good for quite a long while I might be induced to buy it for her.  It was a sturdy little animal, and could be made useful.  Anyhow, it would give Veronica an object in life—something to strive for—which was just what she wanted.  He is a thoughtful lad at times, is Dick.
The dinner was more successful than I had hoped for.  Robina gave us melon as a hors d’œuvre, followed by sardines and a fowl, with potatoes and vegetable marrow.  Her cooking surprised me.  I had warned young Bute that it might be necessary to regard this dinner rather as a joke than as an evening meal, and was prepared myself to extract amusement from it rather than nourishment.  My disappointment was agreeable.  One can always imagine a comic dinner.
I dined once with a newly married couple who had just returned from their honeymoon.  We ought to have sat down at eight o’clock; we sat down instead at half-past ten.  The cook had started drinking in the morning; by seven o’clock she was speechless.  The wife, giving up hope at a quarter to eight, had cooked the dinner herself.  The other guests were sympathised with, but all I got was congratulation.
“He’ll write something so funny about this dinner,” they said.
You might have thought the cook had got drunk on purpose to oblige me.  I have never been able to write anything funny about that dinner; it depresses me to this day, merely thinking of it.
We finished up with a cold trifle and some excellent coffee that Robina brewed over a lamp on the table while Dick and Veronica cleared away.  It was one of the jolliest little dinners I have ever eaten; and, if Robina’s figures are to be trusted, cost exactly six-and-fourpence for the five of us.  There being no servants about, we talked freely and enjoyed ourselves.  I began once at a dinner to tell a good story about a Scotchman, when my host silenced me with a look.  He is a kindly man, and had heard the story before.  He explained to me afterwards, over the walnuts, that his parlourmaid was Scotch and rather touchy.  The talk fell into the discussion of Home Rule, and again our host silenced us.  It seemed his butler was an Irishman and a violent Parnellite.  Some people can talk as though servants were mere machines, but to me they are human beings, and their presence hampers me.  I know my guests have not heard the story before, and from one’s own flesh and blood one expects a certain amount of sacrifice.  But I feel so sorry for the housemaid who is waiting; she must have heard it a dozen times.  I really cannot inflict it upon her again.
After dinner we pushed the table into a corner, and Dick extracted a sort of waltz from Robina’s mandoline.  It is years since I danced; but Veronica said she would rather dance with me any day than with some of the “lumps” you were given to drag round by the dancing-mistress.  I have half a mind to take it up again.  After all, a man is only as old as he feels.
Young Bute, it turned out, was a capital dancer, and could even reverse, which in a room fourteen feet square is of advantage.  Robina confided to me after he was gone that while he was dancing she could just tolerate him.  I cannot myself see rhyme or reason in Robina’s objection to him.  He is not handsome, but he is good-looking, as boys go, and has a pleasant smile.  Robina says it is his smile that maddens her.  Dick agrees with me that there is sense in him; and Veronica, not given to loose praise, considers his performance of a Red Indian, both dead and alive, the finest piece of acting she has ever encountered.  We wound up the evening with a little singing.  The extent of Dick’s repertoire surprised me; evidently he has not been so idle at Cambridge as it seemed.  Young Bute has a baritone voice of some richness.  We remembered at quarter-past eleven that Veronica ought to have gone to bed at eight.  We were all of us surprised at the lateness of the hour.
“Why can’t we always live in a cottage and do just as we like?  I’m sure it’s much jollier,” Veronica put it to me as I kissed her good night.
“Because we are idiots, most of us, Veronica,” I answered.

dijous, 13 de febrer de 2014

QUID EST VERITAS - DESDE O TEMPO EM QUE A ETIQUETA EXIGIU AOS VENDEDORES DE DÍVIDAS SEREM CHAMADOS DE BANQUEIROS E AS SUAS TRÍADES DE AGENTES COMERCIAIS EM TROIKAS DE CAVALGADURAS RUSSAS AO PORTEIRO DA BANCARROTA DEU-SE O NOME DE PRIMEIRO ENTRE OS MINISTROS E SALVADOR DA DÍVIDA TERNA E ETERNA

A TENDÊNCIA DESTES EPÍTETOS ALTISSONANTES

PARA OS CARGOS DE MAIORAL

DAS RESES PARA ABATE

COMEÇOU NAS UNIVERSIDADES DA NOÇÃO DE NAÇÃO

DIVISA MAS PARADOXALMENTE UNA PELAS DIVISAS

E OS CRAVOS QUE DÃO ALEGRES ESCRAVOS

CHEGAM BREVEMENTE EM PEQUENAS MENSALIDADES

OU  COMENSAL IDADES

UMA GERONTOCRACIA DESSAS


dijous, 6 de febrer de 2014

FILOLAU ARQUELAU MENELAU - DO FASCÍNIO FASCISTA DOS NATURAIS COM OS COLONOS OR CU LONE'S GREGOS E AFINS

GOSTAMOS DE MANDAR PARA A ARENA CULTURAL

NOMES DE LAMECHAS ROMÂNTICOS QUE TENHAM OBTIDO SUSEXO

LÁ NO EXTERIOR DA JANGADA DE PIEDRA FEITA

OS FRANCESES GOSTAM DA MALA DE CARTÃO....

ENTÃO VIVA A MALA DE CARTÃO

JAMES BOND VAI FAZER UM FILME NA SERRA DOS ARRÁBIDOS?

VIVA A RAIVA

IGLESIAS VEM AO CASINO DOS QUE TÊM TANTO BAGO

QUE ATÉ O JOGAM EM ROLETAS RUSSAS E SOVIÉTICAS

VIVA IGLESIAS

IGLESIAS QUER RECEBER EM DÓLARES?

É SÓ IMPRIMIR OS NOSSOS FALSÁRIOS SÃO TÃO BONS COMO OS NORTE-COREANOS

E GERALMENTE NÃO SÃO EXECUTADOS QUANDO FAZEM UM MAU TRABALHO

O QUE IMPEDE A RENOVAÇÃO DA FUNÇÃO DITA PÚBICA OU PÚDICA

UMA PUBLICIDADE DESSAS...

dimecres, 29 de gener de 2014

MAIS VALE A PRAXE DIALÉCTICA QUE A PRAXIS PARIPATÉTICA DA ESCOLA PERIPATÉTICA QUE NESTA MÉTRICA ANAXIMÉTRICA TEM O QUADRADO DA HIPOTENUSA CHEIO DE TUSA OU DE LUSA UMA COUSA ASSIS COMO UMA LOUSA DE ANATEXIAS PUERIS....É VIS A VIS QUEM PRECISA DE BÁCULO SÃO OS IMBECIS....

ora hiperligação permanente
30 Janeiro, 2014 00:59
PUERILMENTE TE TESTO
infantilmente te detesto
o fraco texto
UM BLOGUE PARA ESPANTALHOS E ZOMBIES À CAÇA DE MIOLEIRAS E ERZATS MARXISTAS
mercredi 29 janvier 2014
O PARADIGMA DO PROFESSOR OU PROFESSORAL- COMO MONTAR UM PROFESSOR SEM SER ACUSADO DE PRAXE ACADÉMICA E SEM SOBRAREM PEÇAS SOLTAS OU PELO MENOS QUE SOBREM PEQUENINAS PARA LHAS ENFIAREM NO ….NO….O TERMO ELUDE-ME OU ILUDE-ME?
SENDO UM PARADIGMA UM MODELO LÓGICO
E COM UM SISTEMA DE AXIOMAS ACOPLADO
O ESTADO QUER APARENTEMENTE O ESTADO É ANTROPOMÓRFICO E TEM VONTADES
TESTAR O PARADIGMA PROFESSORAL
E QUER FAZÊ-LO COMO….
COM UM TESTE QUE TUDO TESTE
ESTE TESTE QUE HÁ ANOS CLAMA
PASSAPORTE EDUCACIONAL FINAL
PASSA PORTAS MUY BANANAL
OU ANAL NO ESTADO EM CHAMA
QUEM TESTAIS?
ANIMAIS…
QUEM PRAXAIS?
UMAS BESTAS
BESTAS DAS MAIS BRUTAIS
BESTAS DAS MAIS LESTAS
BESTAS PROFISSIONAIS
QUE TESTAIS VÓS?
O CONHECIMENTO DOS AVÓS….
A ENCICLOPÉDIA
E OBVIAMENTE A MÉDIA
E O DESVIO PADRÃO
DA EDUCAÇÃO
O TESTE TEM SEMPRE RAZÃO
O TESTE É ORAÇÃO
O TESTE
POR MAIS QUE O DETESTE
É DELIRIUM SACRO PURO
O TESTE TESTA O MAIS DURO…
Publié par good churrasco ó auto de café…
Libellés : OURO MOLE QUE OS TOLOS FAZEM DURO, OURO TOLO QUE OS ÓXIDOS FAZEM ESCURO….QUAL É O NOME DO MINERAL ?, TESTO O TESTE EM OURO QUASE PURO

divendres, 24 de gener de 2014

A LINGUAGEM POÉTICA É ASSAZ PATÉTICA TENHA SATANÁS SATANAZ SANTANA ANANÁS OU MESMO UM CARECA GORDO ET POLIGÂMICO COMO MESSIEUR FRANÇOIS DE RESTO EN RESTOS APODRECE A POESIA POLÍTICA QUE APOLITICAMENTE FENECE ....

É preciso DESenterrar SATANAZ
é preciso dizer a toda a gente
QUE DE FRENTE É O SENHOR FRANÇOIS
POIS ELE MENTE FRACAMENTE
que o Desejado já não pode vir A BERLIM
É preciso quebrar na ideia e na TENSÃO
a guitarra fantástica QUE DÁ TESÃO
QUE A POLÍTICA trouxe A MIM
ALEGRE digo que está morto.
Deixai em paz SATANAZ
ALEGRE AMIGO DO BOM PORTO
COMO O BOM SENHOR FRANÇOIS
deixai-o no desastre e na loucura.
QUE NO SOCIALISMO PASSA POR GÁGÁ TERNURA
temos SOARES aqui à mão
NÃO NECESSITAMOS DE XÉXÉ REPETIÇÃO
a terra da aventura.
NA MEMÓRIA PERDURA
É DA MEMÓRIA FUTURA
E PRETA É NA ALVURA
E QUEM VOS ATURA
DECERTO É CATURRA…
AH QUE BENZEDURA
MAIS BURRA…..
Vós que trazeis por dentro
ESSE PORTENTO
QUE POIA EM cada gesto
uma caGada humilhação
E NOS GASES DO RESTO
deixai falar na vossa voz a voz do vento
QUE É MUDA EM CADA MOVIMENTO
cantai em tom de grito e de protesto
ATESTAI O DEPÓSITO COMO O EGO ATESTO
matai dentro de vós SATANAZ
QUE É O CLONE DO SEIGNEUR FRNÇOIS
QUE A TODOS APRAZIA MAS JÁ NÃO APRAZ
POIS PADECE DE AFASIA
COMO JÁ PADECIA
O GAMA RAPAZ…..
Quem vai tocar a rebate QUEM É SINO OU QUEM É ASSASSINO?
os sinos de Portugal? NESTA POESIA BANAL ?
Poeta: é tempo de um punhal OU DUM ALBERTO CONTINENTAL?
por dentro da canção.HÁ UM SOARES EM BOTÃO?
Que é preciso bater na troika que nos bate NESTE MORTAL KOMBAT QUE A TOLA NOS ATOLA?
é preciso enterrar o senhor François.ELE É O O GENERAL SATANAZ O ANTI-CHRISTO QUE O APOCALIPSE NOS TRÁS E O APOCALIPSE VEM LÁ ATRAZ....OU ANTRAZ?

divendres, 17 de gener de 2014

A PURBLIND OLIGARCHY THAT FLATLY REFUSED TO SEE THAT HISTORY WAS CONDEMNING IT TO THE DUSTBIN OF CIVILIZATIONS AND HORDAS DE MIGRANTES QUE SAQUEIAM OS SEDENTÁRIOS QUE AS CONSTROEM COMO CON'S É A VITÓRIA DOS POVOS DO MAR SOBRE OS EGÍPCIOS DO PASSADO TENSO PARA MEMÓRIA FUTURA DUM FUTURO APAGADO E MAL PASSADO OU EM SANGUE...


a purblind oligarchy that flatly refused to see that history was condemning it to the dustbin  - Griffin DOR....

with which they had to struggle not only in the society in which they found themselves, but within themselves....


 It is not a conflict of light and darkness we have to describe; 

it is the struggle of the purblind among the blind. 

We have to realize that for all that they were haunted by a vision of the civilized world of to-day, they still belonged not to our age but to their own. 

The thing imagined in their minds was something quite distinct from their present reality. 
Maxwell Brown has devoted several chapters, and a third great supplementary volume, to a special selection of early Modern State Prophets who followed public careers. 
He showed conclusively that in the third and fourth decades of the twentieth century there was a rapidly increasing number of men and women with a clear general conception of the possibilities of the modern world. 
He gives their written and spoken words, often astoundingly prescient and explicit. 
And then he traces out the tenor of their lives subsequent to these utterances. 
The discrepancy of belief and effort is a useful and indeed a startling reminder of the conditional nature of the individual life.

As he writes: "In the security and serenity of the study, these men and women could see plainly. In those hours of withdrawal, the fragile delicate brain matter could escape from immediacy, apprehended causation in four dimensions, reach forward to the permanent values of social events in the space-time framework. But even to the study there penetrated the rumble of the outer disorder. And directly the door was opened, forthwith the uproar of contemporary existence, the carnival, the riot, the war and the market, beat in triumphantly. 

The raging question of what had to be done that day, scattered the fine thought of our common destiny to the four winds of heaven."

Maxwell Brown adds a vivid illustration to this passage.
 It is the facsimile of the first draft by Peter Raut, the American progressive leader, of the Revolutionary Manifesto of 1937. 
It was indisputably a very inspiring document in its time and Raut gave the last proof of loyalty to the best in his mind, by a courageous martyrdom. 
But in the margin of this draft one's attention is caught by a maze of little figures; little sums in multiplication and addition. By his almost inspired gift for evidence and through the industry of his group of research assistants, Maxwell Brown has been able to demonstrate exactly what these sums were. They show that even while Raut, so far as his foresight permitted, was planning our new world, his thoughts were not wholly fixed on that end. They wandered. 

For a time the manifesto was neglected while he did these sums. He was gambling in industrial equities, and a large and active portion of his brain was considering whether the time had arrived to sell.

3. — THE ACCUMULATING DISPROPORTIONS
OF THE OLD ORDER

Let us consider some of the main appearances that disposed many minds to expect a world community in the early twentieth century. In the first place a very considerable financial unity had been achieved. 

The credit of the City of London ran to the ends of the earth and the gold sovereign was for all practical purposes a world coin, exchangeable locally for local expenditure within relatively slight fluctuations. 

Economic life was becoming very generalized. Over great areas trade moved with but small impediments, and the British still hoped to see their cosmopolitan conception of Free Trade accepted by the whole world. 

The International Institute of Agriculture in Rome was developing an annual census of staple production and reaching out towards a world control of commodity transport. 

Considerable movements and readjustments of population were going on, unimpeded by any government interference. 

Swarms of Russian Poles, for instance, drifted into Eastern Germany for the harvest work and returned; hundreds of thousands of Italians went to work in the United States for a few years and then came back with their earnings to their native villages. An ordinary traveller might go all over the more settled parts of the earth and never be asked for a passport unless he wanted to obtain a registered letter at a post office or otherwise prove his identity.
A number of minor but significant federal services had also come into existence and had a sound legal standing throughout the world, the Postal Union for example. Before 1914 C.E. a written document was delivered into the hands of the addressee at almost every point upon the planet, almost as surely as, if less swiftly than, it is to-day. (The Historical Documents Board has recently reprinted a small book, International Government, prepared for the little old Fabian Society during the Great War period by L. S. Woolf, which gives a summary of such arrangements. He lists twenty-three important world unions dealing at that time with trade, industry, finance, communications, health, science, art, literature, drugs, brothels, criminals, emigration and immigration and minor political affairs.) These world-wide cooperations seemed —more particularly to the English-speaking peoples—to presage a direct and comparatively smooth transition from the political patchwork of the nineteenth century, as the divisions of the patchwork grew insensibly fainter, to a stable confederation of mankind. The idea of a coming World-State was quite familiar at the time—one finds it, for instance, as early as Lord Tennyson's Locksley Hall (published in 1842); but there was no effort whatever to achieve it, and indeed no sense of the need of such effort. The World-State was expected to come about automatically by the inherent forces in things.
That belief in some underlying benevolence in uncontrolled events was a common error, one might almost say THE common error, of the time. It affected every school of thought. In exactly the same fashion the followers of Marx (before the invigorating advent of Lenin and the Bolshevist reconstruction of Communism) regarded their dream of world communism as inevitable, and the disciples of Herbert Spencer found a benevolent Providence in "free competition". "Trust Evolution", said the extreme Socialist and the extreme Individualist, as piously as the Christians put their trust in God. It was the Bolshevik movement in the twentieth century which put will into Communism. The thought of the nineteenth century revolutionary and reactionary alike was saturated with that confident irresponsible laziness. As Professor K. Chandra Sen has remarked, hope in the Victorian period was not a stimulant but an opiate.
We who live in a disciplined order, the chastened victors of a hard- fought battle, understand how superficial and unsubstantial were all those hopeful appearances. The great processes of mechanical invention, which have been described in our general account of the release of experimental science from deductive intellectualism, were increasing the power and range of every operating material force quite irrespective of its fitness or unfitness for the new occasions of mankind. With an equal impartiality they were bringing world-wide understanding and world-wide massacre into the range of human possibility.
It was through no fault of these inventors and investigators that the new opportunities they created were misused. That was outside their range. They had as yet no common culture of their own. Nor, since each worked in his own field, were they responsible for the fragmentary irregularity of their discoveries. Biological and especially social invention were lagging far behind the practical advances of the exacter, simpler sciences. Their application was more difficult; the matters they affected were so much more deeply embedded in ordinary use and wont, variation was more intimate, novelties could not be inserted with the same freedom. It was easy to supplant the coach and horses on the macadamized road by the steam-engine or the railway, because it was not necessary to do anything to the road or the coach and horses to bring about the change. They were just left alone to run themselves out as the railroad (and later the automobile on the rubber-glass track) superseded them. But men cannot set up new social institutions, new social and political and industrial relationships, side by side with the old in that fashion. It must be an altogether tougher and slower job. It is a question not of ousting but of reconstruction. The old must be converted into the new without ceasing for a moment to be a going concern. The over-running of the biologically old by the mechanically new, due to these differences in timing, was inevitable, and it reached its maximum in the twentieth century.
A pathological analogy may be useful here. In the past, before the correlation of development in living organisms began to be studied, people used to suffer helplessly and often very dreadfully from all sorts of irregularities of growth in their bodies. The medical services of the time, such as they were, were quite unable to control them. One of these, due to what is called the Nurmi ratios in the blood, was a great overproduction of bone, either locally or generally. The suffered gradually underwent distortion into a clumsy caricature of his former self; his features became coarse and massive, his skull bones underwent a monstrous expansion; the proportions of his limbs altered, and the leverage of his muscles went askew. He was made to look grotesque; he was crippled and at last killed. Something strictly parallel happened to human society in the hundred years before the Great War. Under the stimulus of mechanical invention and experimental physics it achieved, to pursue our metaphor, a hypertrophy of bone, muscle and stomach, without any corresponding enlargement of its nervous controls.
Long before the Great War this progressive disproportion had been dimly recognized by many observers. The favourite formula was to declare that "spiritual"—for the naïve primordial opposition of spirit and matter was still accepted in those days—had not kept pace with "material" advance. This was usually said with an air of moral superiority to the world at large. Mostly there was a vague implication that if these other people would only refrain from using modern inventions so briskly, or go to church more, or marry earlier and artlessly, or read a more "spiritual" type of literature, or refrain from mixed bathing, or work harder and accept lower wages, or be more respectful and obedient to constituted authority, all might yet be well. Beyond this sort of thing there was little recognition of the great and increasing disharmonies of the social corpus until after the Great War.
The young reader will ask, "But where was the Central Observation Bureau? Where was the professorial and student body which should have been recording these irregularities and producing plans for adjustment?"
There was no Central Observation Bureau. That did not exist for another century. That complex organization of discussion, calculation, criticism and forecast was undreamt of. Those cities of thought, full of serene activities, came into existence only after the organization of the Record and Library Network under the Air Dictatorship between 2010 and 2030. Even the mother thought-city, the World Encyclopaedia Establishment, was not founded until 2012. In the early twentieth century there was still no adequate estimate of economic forces and their social reactions. There were only a few score professors and amateurs of these fundamentally important studies scattered throughout the earth. They were scattered in every sense; even their communications were unsystematic. They had no powers of enquiry, no adequate statistics, little prestige; few people heeded what they thought or said.
Maybe they deserved nothing better. They bickered stupidly with and discredited each other. They ignored or wilfully misunderstood each other. It is impossible to read such social and economic literature as the period produced without realizing the extraordinary backwardness of that side of the world's intellectual life. It is difficult to believe nowadays that the writers of these publications, at once tediously copious and incredibly jejune, were living at the same time as the lively multitude of workers in the experimental sciences which were daily adding to and reshaping knowledge to achieve fresh practical triumphs. From 1812 C.E., when public gas-lighting was first organized, to the outbreak of the Great War, while the world was being made over anew by gas, by steam, by oil, and then by the swift headlong development of electrical science, while the last terrae incognitae were being explored and mapped, while a multitude of hitherto unthought-of elements and compounds and hundreds of thousands of new substances were coming into use, while epidemic diseases were being restrained and driven back, while the death rate was being halved, and the average duration of life increased by a score of years, the social and political sciences remained practically stagnant and unserviceable. Throughout that century of material achievement there is no single instance of the successful application of a social, economic or educational generalization.
Because of this belatedness of the social sciences, the progressive dislocation of the refined if socially limited and precarious civilization of the more advanced of the eighteenth and nineteenth century sovereign states went on without any effectual contemporary understanding of what was straining it to pieces.
 The Europeans and the Americans of the early twentieth century apprehended the social and political forces that ravaged their lives hardly more clearly than the citizens of the Roman Empire during its collapse. 

Plenty and the appearance of security HAPPENED; then débâcle HAPPENED. 

There was no analysis of operating causes. For years even quite bold and advanced thinkers were chased by events. They did not grasp what was occurring at the time. They only realized what had really occurred long afterwards. And so they never foresaw. There was no foresight, and therefore still less could there be any understanding control.

dissabte, 4 de gener de 2014

WORDS THAT TOOK US IN....CON'S R'US....MORONS R'THIS FANUM PEOPLE....JESUS HOMINUM SALVATOR - KAI TA LEIPOMENA He drew a circle that shut me out-- Heretic, a rebel, a thing to flout. But Love and I had the wit to win: We drew a circle that took him in....

QUANTUM VIS ?

QUANTUM SUFFICIT....

The Soaristan and Kavakisthan people
uses a circle to keep out all who don't think the same way they  do
 we need a circle to include this people and these state's
For the Soaristan and kavakisthan and sovietistan people , ideology or a belief system is most important; to the plebe....ignara plebe they believe at sunday's that  love the state is the solution....

CON SENSUS OR SENSUS FOR CON'S OR MORONS : morons moros and cons believe that you can go beyond all differences and bring morons con's and othelos together

Ihr Hotel Cid El MoroMit Tiefpreisgarantie billig buchen‎.....

SINE ANNO....

SECUNDUM ARTEM SCULPIT

CADEIAS DE LETRAS QUE FORMAM PALAVRAS PARVAS

SUB HOC VERBO SUB HAC VOCE

SINE MACULA PROLE PROLETA....

SECUNDUM NATURAM

TALIS QUALIS....

And till it come, we men are slaves,
And travel downward to the dust of graves.
Come, clear the way, then, clear the way;
Blind creeds and kings have had their day;
Break the dead branches from the path;
Out Hope is in the aftermath
Our hope is in heroic men
Star-led to build the world again.
Make way for brotherhood
make way for Man


O masters, lords and rulers in all lands,
How will the Future reckon with this man?
How answer his brute question in that hour
When whirlwinds of rebellion shake all shores?
How will it be with kingdoms and with kings
With those who shaped him to the thing he is
When this dumb terror shall rise to judge the world,
After the silence of the centuries?


outwitted by Edwin Markham

He drew a circle to shut me out,
heretic rebel, a thing to flout.
But love and I had the wit to win,
we drew a circle that took him in
 
The laws are the secret avengers,
And they rule above all lands;
They come on wool-soft sandals,
But they strike with iron hands.....DA FRACA CONSTITUIÇÃO DAS PALAVRAS FEITAS LEI.....